🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Movement

Across Europe, a rising chorus of countries are moving toward comparable bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and networks are "taking away our kids' childhood". The policy may be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to approve a bill increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a advisory motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," said one parliamentarian behind the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a young person who was lost after being exposed to disturbing online content contends that a simple age ban might not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, action is mostly happening at the regional level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures requiring guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to mimic Australia's path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, other states are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, international organizations adopt a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The body notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and several other countries indicate that policymakers globally are less and less content to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.